| Title |
Circadian actin dynamics drive rhythmic fibroblast mobilization during wound healing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal2774 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathaniel P Hoyle, Estere Seinkmane, Marrit Putker, Kevin A Feeney, Toke P Krogager, Johanna E Chesham, Liam K Bray, Justyn M Thomas, Ken Dunn, John Blaikley, John S O'Neill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 22% |
| United States | 38 | 21% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 61% |
| Scientists | 51 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 21% |
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 11% |
| Engineering | 20 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 853. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,527
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#85
of 5,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375
of 343,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#1
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.