↓ Skip to main content

Science Translational Medicine

Effects of caffeine on the human circadian clock in vivo and in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Science Translational Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 5,476)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
107 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
468 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Effects of caffeine on the human circadian clock in vivo and in vitro
Published in
Science Translational Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina M Burke, Rachel R Markwald, Andrew W McHill, Evan D Chinoy, Jesse A Snider, Sara C Bessman, Christopher M Jung, John S O'Neill, Kenneth P Wright

Abstract

Caffeine's wakefulness-promoting and sleep-disrupting effects are well established, yet whether caffeine affects human circadian timing is unknown. We show that evening caffeine consumption delays the human circadian melatonin rhythm in vivo and that chronic application of caffeine lengthens the circadian period of molecular oscillations in vitro, primarily with an adenosine receptor/cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-dependent mechanism. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, ~49-day long, within-subject study, we found that consumption of a caffeine dose equivalent to that in a double espresso 3 hours before habitual bedtime induced a ~40-min phase delay of the circadian melatonin rhythm in humans. This magnitude of delay was nearly half of the magnitude of the phase-delaying response induced by exposure to 3 hours of evening bright light (~3000 lux, ~7 W/m(2)) that began at habitual bedtime. Furthermore, using human osteosarcoma U2OS cells expressing clock gene luciferase reporters, we found a dose-dependent lengthening of the circadian period by caffeine. By pharmacological dissection and small interfering RNA knockdown, we established that perturbation of adenosine receptor signaling, but not ryanodine receptor or phosphodiesterase activity, was sufficient to account for caffeine's effects on cellular timekeeping. We also used a cyclic AMP biosensor to show that caffeine increased cyclic AMP levels, indicating that caffeine influenced a core component of the cellular circadian clock. Together, our findings demonstrate that caffeine influences human circadian timing, showing one way that the world's most widely consumed psychoactive drug affects human physiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 468 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
Japan 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 450 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 17%
Student > Master 58 12%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 76 16%
Unknown 122 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 10%
Neuroscience 33 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 6%
Other 86 18%
Unknown 144 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1259. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#10,980
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#33
of 5,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 269,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#1
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.