| Title |
In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei-Hsi Yeh, Olga Shubina-Oleinik, Jonathan M Levy, Bifeng Pan, Gregory A Newby, Michael Wornow, Rachel Burt, Jonathan C Chen, Jeffrey R Holt, David R Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 70% |
| Scientists | 25 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#206,995
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#626
of 5,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,986
of 434,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#8
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.