The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Delivery of therapeutic carbon monoxide by gas-entrapping materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.abl4135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James D Byrne, David Gallo, Hannah Boyce, Sarah L Becker, Kristi M Kezar, Alicia T Cotoia, Vivian R Feig, Aaron Lopes, Eva Csizmadia, Maria Serena Longhi, Jung Seung Lee, Hyunjoon Kim, Adam J Wentworth, Sidharth Shankar, Ghee Rye Lee, Jianling Bi, Emily Witt, Keiko Ishida, Alison Hayward, Johannes L P Kuosmanen, Josh Jenkins, Jacob Wainer, Aya Aragon, Kaitlyn Wong, Christoph Steiger, William R Jeck, Dustin E Bosch, Mitchell C Coleman, Douglas R Spitz, Michael Tift, Robert Langer, Leo E Otterbein, Giovanni Traverso |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#170,457
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#519
of 5,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,133
of 446,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#24
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.